Bahamian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bahamian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bahamians
Chickasaw
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Bahamian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,060,637 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Chickasaw.
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 34.2%), median male earnings ($44,756 compared to $47,832, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $53,732, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,427 compared to $36,475, a difference of 0.13%), median household income ($69,726 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.0%).
Income Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,427 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,631 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,726 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,735 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,756 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,125 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,743 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,395 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,369 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,000 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.2%), poverty (15.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (40.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (41.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.22%), college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Bahamian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Bahamian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |