Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chickasaw
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,815,844 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.8% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 44.2% | 62.8% |
Range | 36.3% | 56.3% |
Mean | 26.9% | 27.4% |
Median | 28.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.3% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |