Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaScotlandSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nashville
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville

100.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.372209.3%32.9%(-23.6)#4635.2%(-25.8)#3,320
2.3721525.2%32.9%(-7.72)#34035.2%(-9.96)#17,684
3.3722128.1%32.9%(-4.83)#38935.2%(-7.07)#19,782
4.3721628.7%32.9%(-4.26)#39835.2%(-6.50)#20,199
5.3721830.4%32.9%(-2.53)#43235.2%(-4.77)#21,318
6.3720531.2%32.9%(-1.77)#44035.2%(-4.01)#21,762
7.3721438.8%32.9%(+5.90)#50535.2%(+3.66)#25,323
8.3720743.4%32.9%(+10.5)#52435.2%(+8.22)#26,636
9.3720444.4%32.9%(+11.4)#52935.2%(+9.19)#26,870
10.3720650.2%32.9%(+17.2)#54335.2%(+15.0)#28,045
11.3721151.0%32.9%(+18.1)#54635.2%(+15.8)#28,171
12.3720151.1%32.9%(+18.1)#54835.2%(+15.9)#28,180
13.3721753.4%32.9%(+20.5)#55935.2%(+18.2)#28,545
14.3720954.5%32.9%(+21.6)#56135.2%(+19.4)#28,701
15.3721257.8%32.9%(+24.8)#56735.2%(+22.6)#29,080
16.3720867.9%32.9%(+35.0)#58035.2%(+32.7)#29,916
17.3721072.7%32.9%(+39.7)#58135.2%(+37.5)#30,174
18.3721976.2%32.9%(+43.2)#58435.2%(+41.0)#30,305
19.3720380.8%32.9%(+47.9)#58835.2%(+45.6)#30,453
20.3722899.2%32.9%(+66.3)#59335.2%(+64.0)#30,782
21.37213100.0%32.9%(+67.1)#59535.2%(+64.8)#31,051

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN are:
#1
9.3%
#2
25.2%
#3
28.1%
#4
28.7%
#5
30.4%
#6
31.2%
#7
38.8%
#8
43.4%
#9
44.4%
#10
50.2%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
37220 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN with 9.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville, TN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nashville is 46.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tennessee?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tennessee is 32.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.