Cambodian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Chinese
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,066,039 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Chinese.
Cambodian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $77,465, a difference of 15.8%), per capita income ($51,731 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($62,516 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.21%), median family income ($117,780 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Average 25.9% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.7%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.4%), family households (61.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 61.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.5%), master's degree (20.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Cambodian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.9%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |