Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Chinese
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.35% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 19.1% |
Range | 13.5% | 17.8% |
Mean | 6.2% | 6.8% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |