Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Chinese
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,055,698 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.562% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 562.3 Chinese.
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,417 compared to $116,156, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $41,461, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($43,516 compared to $46,098, a difference of 5.9%).
Income Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,516 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,092 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,968 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,468 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,409 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,513 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,914 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,987 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,417 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,922 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Average 25.9% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.3%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 250.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.6%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.3%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.5%), associate's degree (43.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and hearing disability (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |