Japanese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Japanese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Japanese
Chinese
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Japanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,850,103 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 17.0 Chinese.
Japanese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $116,156, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $116,188, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($44,825 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.9%).
Income Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,870 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,288 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,395 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,825 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,473 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,528 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,365 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,624 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,834 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,919 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Average 25.9% |
Japanese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 52.3%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.4%).
Poverty Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Japanese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Japanese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Japanese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.25%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Japanese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Japanese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 127.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Japanese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Japanese | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |