Senegalese vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Senegalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Senegalese

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
1,684
SOCIAL INDEX
14.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
292nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Senegalese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,931,996 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Senegalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Senegalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Senegalese corresponds to an increase of 37.6 Chinese.
Senegalese Integration in Chinese Communities

Senegalese vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,591 compared to $77,465, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,897 compared to $116,156, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($74,999 compared to $98,496, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,384 compared to $41,461, a difference of 5.3%), median earnings ($44,373 compared to $48,836, a difference of 10.1%), and per capita income ($41,000 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.4%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Income
Income MetricSenegaleseChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,000
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,475
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,999
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,373
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,774
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,384
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,953
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,852
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,897
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,591
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Average
25.9%

Senegalese vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 73.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.8%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother poverty (31.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.8%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricSenegaleseChinese
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Senegalese vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.3%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.0%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSenegaleseChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Senegalese vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSenegaleseChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
84.1%

Senegalese vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.5%), married-couple households (38.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and currently married (40.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.3%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSenegaleseChinese
Family Households
Tragic
59.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Senegalese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 140.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 104.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 67.8%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSenegaleseChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Senegalese vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and college, under 1 year (63.6% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricSenegaleseChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Senegalese vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.60%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.95%).
Senegalese vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricSenegaleseChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%