Salvadoran vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Salvadorans
Chinese
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Salvadoran Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,235,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Chinese.
Salvadoran vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,141 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($94,109 compared to $116,188, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,842 compared to $116,156, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $58,162, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($37,083 compared to $41,461, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.6%).
Income Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,858 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,109 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,449 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,912 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,646 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,083 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,412 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,198 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,842 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,141 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.0% | Average 25.9% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.8%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.2%).
Poverty Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.3%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.5%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.48 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.48 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 154.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and associate's degree (39.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Salvadoran vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.0%), male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Salvadoran | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |