Australian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,195,552 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.897% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 897.0 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $37,766, a difference of 37.9%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $46,736, a difference of 34.5%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $88,295, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,525, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,695, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $54,526, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 63.2%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 49.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 113.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 69.8%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 16.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%).