Finnish vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Guatemalans
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,074,987 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 10.5 Guatemalans.
Finnish vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $46,736, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($102,676 compared to $88,295, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $35,695, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $54,526, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 69.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 81.2% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Tragic 37.1% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 43.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 137.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Finnish vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | Guatemalan |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |