Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Guatemalans
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,363,210 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.328% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 327.5 Guatemalans.
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $46,736, a difference of 18.5%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $88,295, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,695, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $54,526, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 61.8%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 37.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 113.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Guatemalan |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |