Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,005,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 197.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $97,880, a difference of 11.3%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $47,394, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $57,352, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $63,643, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $41,527, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Good 25.3% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Excellent 30.3% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |