Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Good
Exceptional
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,199,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Slavic Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $47,394, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $97,880, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $57,352, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $104,992, a difference of 2.3%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Good
25.3%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Slavic vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricSlavicImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%