Norwegian vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Norwegians

Chileans

Excellent
Excellent
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Norwegian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,582,328 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Chileans.
Norwegian Integration in Chilean Communities

Norwegian vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.1%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $90,605, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,757, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $56,973, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $108,429, a difference of 2.1%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Income
Income MetricNorwegianChilean
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,480
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,144
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Good
$86,084
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Good
$46,865
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,965
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,802
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,127
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,866
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,682
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,104
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Fair
26.3%

Norwegian vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricNorwegianChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.7%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
11.0%

Norwegian vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNorwegianChilean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.3%

Norwegian vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNorwegianChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
46.2%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Norwegian vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNorwegianChilean
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.08
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.3%
Good
30.7%

Norwegian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNorwegianChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.7%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.8%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
6.4%

Norwegian vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricNorwegianChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
94.0%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.5%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.4%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Norwegian vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Norwegian vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricNorwegianChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%