Chippewa vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Chileans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,287,686 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Chileans.
Chippewa vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $90,605, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,611, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,459, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,185, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,757, a difference of 16.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.0% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.3% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 39.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.92%), family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Good 30.7% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Good 6.4% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chippewa vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |