Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,156,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Chile.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,213, a difference of 26.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,388, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,412, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,440, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,353, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $46,213 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Excellent $105,655 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Excellent $88,388 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Excellent $47,697 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Excellent $55,954 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Good $40,353 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Good $52,440 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Excellent $97,159 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Excellent $103,412 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Excellent $62,354 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Average 25.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Good 15.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Good 11.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Average 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 5.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Good 31.2% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Poor 89.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Poor 54.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 6.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Average 85.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |