Chickasaw vs West Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
West Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
West Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
863
SOCIAL INDEX
6.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
335th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
West Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,349,472 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 509.2 West Indians.
Chickasaw vs West Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,317, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,583, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,936, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,682, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $92,765, a difference of 8.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,217 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $92,765 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $78,455 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Poor $45,132 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,682 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,583 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $87,205 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $89,906 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,936 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 34.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 22.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Average 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.3% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 201.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 23.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 76.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 41.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 56.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs West Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | West Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |