Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Spain
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Spain
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,210
SOCIAL INDEX
69.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
128th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Spain Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,142,843 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Spain. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 45.4 Immigrants from Spain.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,933, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $113,815, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,752, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,540, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,560, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $50,933 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $113,815 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $92,732 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,092 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $60,750 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,815 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,560 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $103,752 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $109,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,540 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 85.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 85.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 50.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 88.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Spain |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |