Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,879,869 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 51.2 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,929, a difference of 28.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $98,849, a difference of 26.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,363, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $56,331, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $103,197, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,929 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $103,197 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,425 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,151 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,941 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,363 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,846 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $98,849 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,523 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $56,331 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.2%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.2%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Excellent 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 17.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Excellent 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 31.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 29.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 25.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 239.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 55.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 85.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 73.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 37.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 61.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 104.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Uzbekistan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.85% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |