Chickasaw vs French American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
French American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
French American Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,780
SOCIAL INDEX
15.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
288th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
French American Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,144,105 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.390% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 389.6 French American Indians.
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $40,244, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $85,899, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,977, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,699, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,611, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,333, a difference of 6.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,244 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $92,872 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $76,387 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,333 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,611 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,920 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,977 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $85,899 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $89,811 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,699 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.4% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.24%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.6% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs French American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | French American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |