Chickasaw vs Lebanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Lebanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Lebanese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lebanese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,192,059 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 43.2 Lebanese.
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,734, a difference of 27.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,091, a difference of 25.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,840, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,355, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,287, a difference of 15.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $45,840 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $107,086 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $88,091 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,226 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,006 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,355 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,339 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $104,734 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $62,287 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.9% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.9%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Poor 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.20%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Lebanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Lebanese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |