Chickasaw vs Slovak Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Slovak
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Slovaks
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slovak Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,457,611 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 47.7 Slovaks.
Chickasaw vs Slovak Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,029, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,032, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $103,729, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,039, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,753, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,229 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $103,729 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,798 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Good $47,095 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,306 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $39,029 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $49,753 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $95,032 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $101,029 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,039 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.9% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.9%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.2%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Fair 17.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.8% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 42.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.06 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 33.4% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 96.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Fair 64.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Slovak Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Slovak |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |