Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hispanic or Latino
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Hispanics or Latinos
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hispanic or Latino Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,634,578 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.517% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 517.3 Hispanics or Latinos.
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,279, a difference of 12.3%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $73,823, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,421, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,647, a difference of 0.34%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,288, a difference of 0.95%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $35,688 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $85,647 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $73,823 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $40,288 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,419 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,421 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,279 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,515 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,006 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $52,832 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Excellent 24.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.39%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.1% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.8% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.80%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 92.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 88.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 87.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 85.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 79.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 29.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Hispanic or Latino Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Hispanic or Latino |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |