Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Northern Africa
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,323,510 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $90,026, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,430, a difference of 28.3%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,531, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,522, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,185, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,531 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $108,161 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $90,026 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $58,008 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,084 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $99,232 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $105,430 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,522 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 60.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 49.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |