Chickasaw vs Jamaican Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jamaican
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Jamaicans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
821
SOCIAL INDEX
5.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
337th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jamaican Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,821,690 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Jamaicans.
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,929, a difference of 13.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,670, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,560, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,632, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $90,581, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,231 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,581 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $76,583 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,632 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,670 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,929 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $83,933 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $88,327 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,560 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 30.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Good 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.5% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 128.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 45.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.6% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 0.050%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.6%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |