Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Africa
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,269
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
25th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Africa Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,894,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Immigrants from South Africa.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $51,465, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,886, a difference of 37.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,800, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,705, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $42,508, a difference of 23.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $51,465 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $116,286 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $95,800 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,850 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $62,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,508 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,705 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $105,748 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $112,886 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $67,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.91%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Average 19.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 78.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 52.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |