Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Indian (Asian)
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Indians (Asian)
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Indian (Asian) Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,591,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 47.8 Indians (Asian).
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $119,496, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $105,262, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $122,343, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $58,239, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $70,238, a difference of 30.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $53,874 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $125,312 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $105,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $56,253 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $66,078 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,481 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $58,239 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $119,496 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $122,343 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $70,238 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.4% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Excellent 19.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 25.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 94.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 54.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 47.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.9% |
Chickasaw vs Indian (Asian) Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 73.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Indian (Asian) |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |