Chinese vs West Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
West Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
West Indians
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
863
SOCIAL INDEX
6.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
335th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
West Indian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,538,544 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 49.0 West Indians.
Chinese vs West Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,936, a difference of 41.0%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 32.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $89,906, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,317, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,132, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $41,217, a difference of 11.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $41,217 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $92,765 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $78,455 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Poor $45,132 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $50,682 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Good $40,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Poor $51,583 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $87,205 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $89,906 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $54,936 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Chinese vs West Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 77.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 20.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Chinese vs West Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 22.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chinese vs West Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 71.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
Chinese vs West Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 40.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 37.3% |
Chinese vs West Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 188.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 109.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 20.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 73.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 23.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 76.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 41.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Chinese vs West Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.3%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.80%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 86.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 56.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chinese vs West Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | West Indian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Poor 11.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |