Chickasaw vs Nepalese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Nepalese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Nepalese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Nepalese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,674,740 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.652% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 652.5 Nepalese.
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,472, a difference of 21.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,410, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,458, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,442, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,860, a difference of 7.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,442 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $94,153 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,410 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,860 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,458 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,603 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,472 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,498 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $93,355 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,761 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.7%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.5% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 30.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Poor 45.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 33.5% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 124.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 29.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 78.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 0.97% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |