Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Southern Europe
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,545
SOCIAL INDEX
53.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
174th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Southern Europe Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,179,844 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 36.7 Immigrants from Southern Europe.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,486, a difference of 32.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,027, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $107,775, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,902, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,484, a difference of 21.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $48,027 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $110,614 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $91,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,280 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $59,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,275 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,484 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $103,486 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $107,775 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,902 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Average 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 82.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 31.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.29%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Poor 92.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Fair 64.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 47.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |