Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,941
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
99th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,055,014 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 7.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $118,056, a difference of 51.5%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $104,796, a difference of 49.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $122,222, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,123, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,872, a difference of 30.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $53,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $125,150 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $104,796 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $56,183 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $66,903 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,502 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,123 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $118,056 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $122,222 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $69,872 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 61.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 44.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 25.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 72.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 96.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 95.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 82.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Excellent 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 71.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 66.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 83.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |