Chickasaw vs Pueblo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Pueblo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Pueblo
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pueblo Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,533,075 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Pueblo.
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,314, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $32,012, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,018, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,930, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $32,564, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $32,012 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $76,880 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $64,692 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $36,859 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $41,314 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $32,564 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,018 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $68,910 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $75,601 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $52,930 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 92.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 60.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 8.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 19.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 26.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 22.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 23.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 23.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 28.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 37.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 17.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 19.9% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 10.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 72.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.5% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 47.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (64.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.79 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 38.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 53.7% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Fair 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 25.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Pueblo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Pueblo |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 33.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 55.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.3% |