Lithuanian vs Pueblo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Pueblo

Excellent
Poor
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pueblo Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,357,416 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 273.9 Pueblo.
Lithuanian Integration in Pueblo Communities

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $32,012, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $68,910, a difference of 52.7%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $76,880, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $45,018, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $52,930, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $32,564, a difference of 29.3%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Income
Income MetricLithuanianPueblo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$32,012
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$76,880
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$64,692
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$36,859
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$41,314
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$32,564
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$45,018
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$68,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$75,601
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Tragic
$52,930
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
20.7%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 180.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 136.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 35.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.9%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianPueblo
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
22.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
28.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
37.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
11.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
19.9%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.1%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianPueblo
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
10.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianPueblo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
59.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
75.5%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 81.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (64.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianPueblo
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
40.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.79
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
38.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
53.7%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.6%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianPueblo
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Fair
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.6%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 72.7%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 65.4%), and associate's degree (50.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianPueblo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
86.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Tragic
82.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
57.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
51.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
34.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
25.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
1.7%

Lithuanian vs Pueblo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.8%).
Lithuanian vs Pueblo Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianPueblo
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
33.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
55.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%