Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Indian (Asian)
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Indians (Asian)
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Indian (Asian) Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,568,729 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.942. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.117% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 1,117.2 Indians (Asian).
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $66,078, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $70,238, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $46,481, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($105,335 compared to $105,262, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $122,343, a difference of 0.14%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $125,312, a difference of 0.18%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $53,874 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $125,312 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $105,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $56,253 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $66,078 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $46,481 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $58,239 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $119,496 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $122,343 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $70,238 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Excellent 19.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 25.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.23%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 31.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.3%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.47%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Good 6.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.1%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 70.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 54.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Indian (Asian) Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Indian (Asian) |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |