Latvian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Chippewa
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,476,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.797% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 797.0 Chippewa.
Latvian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,631, a difference of 43.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $86,852, a difference of 38.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,943, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $53,847, a difference of 25.0%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Excellent 25.0% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.3%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 97.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 81.3% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 80.0%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Latvian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.2%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Chippewa |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |