Latvian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,507,305 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 116.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,104, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $87,255, a difference of 32.9%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $90,543, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,380, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,408, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.7%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.8%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 37.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.9%).