Cuban vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,201,863 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $53,847, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($46,580 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.46%), and median earnings ($40,619 compared to $40,287, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 50.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 90.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 37.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%).