Immigrants from Fiji vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,217,805 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $80,005, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $83,943, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.5%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $36,631, a difference of 16.6%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $46,368, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.4%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 88.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 52.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 6.8%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.20, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (68.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 114.5%), bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 105.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).