Latvian vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,423,625 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.926. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.153% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,153.1 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $31,729, a difference of 65.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $76,605, a difference of 57.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $74,257, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,012, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,266, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $49,234, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 145.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 127.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 113.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 275.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 242.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 237.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 45.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 97.7%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 86.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.30%), 10th grade (95.6% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.9%).