Latvian vs Canadian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Canadian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Canadians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Canadian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,366,559 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.375% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 374.9 Canadians.
Latvian vs Canadian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,858, a difference of 14.8%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $106,597, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $97,625, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,336, a difference of 0.85%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,230, a difference of 8.2%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $45,858 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Excellent $106,597 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Excellent $87,769 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Excellent $47,911 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $57,286 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Average $39,724 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Average $52,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Excellent $97,625 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Excellent $104,560 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Good $62,230 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 28.1% |
Latvian vs Canadian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.6%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Good 16.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvian vs Canadian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Latvian vs Canadian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 40.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Poor 82.4% |
Latvian vs Canadian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 15.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Average 31.9% |
Latvian vs Canadian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Latvian vs Canadian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.4% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Good 47.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Good 38.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Excellent 15.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvian vs Canadian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Canadian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 2.5% |