Latvian vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Comanche
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,982,121 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.950% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 949.6 Comanche.
Latvian vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,088, a difference of 38.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,556, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $85,787, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,518, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $54,922, a difference of 22.6%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Excellent 25.0% |
Latvian vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 56.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.3%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Latvian vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Latvian vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 79.2% |
Latvian vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Latvian vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Latvian vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 76.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Latvian vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Comanche |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |