Latvian vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Turks
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,043,849 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.628% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 627.8 Turks.
Latvian vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,266, a difference of 2.8%), median household income ($97,311 compared to $99,389, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $53,919, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,649 compared to $52,391, a difference of 0.49%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $121,202, a difference of 0.75%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 27.7% |
Latvian vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Latvian vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Latvian vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Latvian vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (62.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Latvian vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Latvian vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and college, under 1 year (71.6% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (53.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.070%), bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Latvian vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Turkish |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |