Latvian vs Seminole Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Seminole

Exceptional
Poor
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Seminole Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,519,530 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 100.1 Seminole.
Latvian Integration in Seminole Communities

Latvian vs Seminole Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,180, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $80,077, a difference of 44.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $83,354, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,649, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $34,385, a difference of 27.8%).
Latvian vs Seminole Income
Income MetricLatvianSeminole
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$36,180
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$83,354
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$69,420
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$46,783
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$34,385
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$45,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$76,584
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$80,077
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$52,373
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Good
25.6%

Latvian vs Seminole Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 68.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.6%).
Latvian vs Seminole Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianSeminole
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
22.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
21.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
21.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
16.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
35.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.8%

Latvian vs Seminole Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Latvian vs Seminole Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianSeminole
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%

Latvian vs Seminole Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Latvian vs Seminole Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianSeminole
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
78.1%

Latvian vs Seminole Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.9%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 36.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.3%).
Latvian vs Seminole Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianSeminole
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
37.9%

Latvian vs Seminole Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.8%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Latvian vs Seminole Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianSeminole
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Latvian vs Seminole Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 95.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 93.6%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Latvian vs Seminole Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianSeminole
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
87.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
52.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
37.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Latvian vs Seminole Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 55.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.5%).
Latvian vs Seminole Disability
Disability MetricLatvianSeminole
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
29.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%