Cambodian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Chippewa
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,970,841 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.410% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 409.6 Chippewa.
Cambodian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $36,631, a difference of 41.2%), median household income ($96,324 compared to $70,539, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $83,943, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $47,015, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $53,847, a difference of 24.2%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Excellent 25.0% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 62.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.4%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 59.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (61.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 72.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Cambodian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |