Latvian vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,692,183 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 338.2 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $43,010, a difference of 22.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $100,962, a difference of 19.2%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $54,168, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,201, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,328, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 54.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 80.8%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%).