Latvian vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Ethiopians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,143,349 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 225.0 Ethiopians.
Latvian vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.6%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,569, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $56,243, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,243, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,818, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,989, a difference of 3.6%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.8%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvian vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Ethiopian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |