Marshallese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,106,213 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 44.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $53,847, a difference of 22.3%), median household income ($78,930 compared to $70,539, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($95,293 compared to $86,852, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $46,368, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $35,003, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($41,969 compared to $40,287, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 23.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.13%), ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 100.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%).