Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chippewa
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,929,929 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $53,847, a difference of 20.4%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and median family income ($78,249 compared to $86,852, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($68,461 compared to $70,539, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $83,943, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $80,005, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 52.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and poverty (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 99.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 44.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and family households (68.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and college, under 1 year (55.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |