Latvian vs Tongan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Tongan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Tongans
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tongan Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,576,825 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 47.5 Tongans.
Latvian vs Tongan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,693, a difference of 26.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $53,218, a difference of 19.3%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $45,665, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $68,235, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $93,076, a difference of 4.5%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $41,693 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Excellent $105,967 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $93,076 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Fair $45,665 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Fair $53,218 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $38,288 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $56,972 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $99,604 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $108,643 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $68,235 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 27.5% |
Latvian vs Tongan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 26.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Latvian vs Tongan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Latvian vs Tongan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 67.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 41.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Excellent 83.1% |
Latvian vs Tongan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.49, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.27%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 69.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 31.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 51.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Latvian vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 64.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 63.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 26.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Latvian vs Tongan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.1%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Poor 90.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Fair 64.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Poor 57.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 34.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Poor 1.7% |
Latvian vs Tongan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Tongan |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Fair 23.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |